Talk:Quadratic reciprocity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear DYLAN LENNON,
Could you please explain how you intend to use quadratic reciprocity to prove fermat's theorem on sums of two squares. The only part that I can see is vaguely relevant is the first supplementary theorem, i.e. that
, which is by far the most trivial part of QR. (I have taken the liberty of reverting your edit again until you can provide an explanation.) Dmharvey 01:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
You can learn by reading this note. (http://www.math.nmsu.edu/~history/book/numbertheory.pdf) Good luck DYLAN LENNON 02:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- I've had a look, and I can't find what you mean. Could you give a page number perhaps? Even better, which paragraph/sentence supports your claim? Dmharvey 02:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] ZX81
There is this lovely line in the ZX81 manual:
- 65537 is a Fermat prime, 216 + 1. Use this, and Gauss's Law of Quadratic Reciprocity, to prove that 75 is a primitive root modulo 65537.
Needless to say I am none the wiser!
- Having now discovered the primitive root modulo n page, it transpires that all I needed to do was to verify that

[edit] n-th reciprocity
Is there a further formulation of reciprocity?? let's say an study of the solutions:
xn = pmod(q) xn = qmod(p) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.85.100.144 (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Python code for residue table
I started trying to make a table of residues to illustrate quadratic reciprocity, but it soon got very painful to do by hand. So I wrote a Python script (my first!) to do it for me. Of course, just editing the script here won't update the table, you'll have to run it on your own machine :-)
# find primes from 3 up to max
max = 50
primes = []
for n in range(3, max):
composite = False
for d in range(2, n-1):
if n % d == 0:
composite = True
break
if not composite:
primes.append(n)
count = len(primes)
yes_marker = '✓' # tick (U.S. "check") for residues
no_marker = '✗' # cross for non-residues
def colortag(n):
if n % 4 == 1:
return 'bgcolor=#e0ffff'
else:
return 'bgcolor=#ffe0e0'
# computes Legendre symbol (a/q)
# assumes a and q positive, q prime, (a, q) = 1
def legendre(a, q):
for n in range(1, q-1):
if (n * n) % q == a % q:
return 1;
return -1;
# print table header
print '{| class="wikitable"'
print '|-'
print '| || colspan=' + str(count+1), 'align="center" |', "''p''"
print '|-'
print '| rowspan=' + str(count+1), "| ''q'' || ",
for p in primes:
print '||', colortag(p), 'align="center" style="border-bottom:2px solid" |', "'''" + str(p) + "'''",
print
# now the main table
for q in primes:
# first column
print '|-'
print '|', colortag(q), 'align="right" style="border-right:2px solid" |', "''' " + str(q) + " '''",
# remaining columns
for p in primes:
print '||', colortag(1+(p-1)*(q-1)/2), '|',
if p == q:
print ' ',
else:
# symbol for (p/q)
if legendre(p, q) == 1:
print yes_marker,
else:
print no_marker,
if legendre(q, p) == 1:
print yes_marker,
else:
print no_marker,
print
print '|}'
Dmharvey 03:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chart
Something's wrong with the chart... the check and cross marks both look like boxes.
63.228.45.224 16:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I changed the table to use images instead of Unicode characters, as the Unicode characters don't show up on all computers (see previous comment). I put the new code on User:chridd/sandbox1 because of the Don't edit comments on talk pages policy. I changed
yes_marker = '✓' # tick (U.S. "check") for residues
no_marker = '✗' # cross for non-residues
to
yes_marker = '[[Image:Yes check.svg|10px]]' # tick (U.S. "check") for residues
no_marker = '[[Image:Black x.svg|10px]]' # cross for non-residues
~User:chridd [[tʃɹɪ|Special:Contributions]] 03:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] history section
I will add a brief history section soon. User:Virginia-American/Sandbox has changes for the article on quadratic residues. I don't anticipate anything so extensive here.
How about FAQ's
Why did CFG do so many proofs? Why has everyone else as well? Why "law" (it's not a thing like other laws, eg. commutative law of addition)? Virginia-American (talk) 01:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

