User talk:Qsaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I wish myself a warm wellcome. --Qsaw ^(talk) 10:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 W.A.S.P. 2 Inner belt 3 Moving the slayer 4 Corset

[edit] W.A.S.P.

When moving a page, you should change every link to the page. Now every article about W.A.S.P. albums, for instance, link to the new page about the acronym.--Odd M. Nilsen 18:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

OK, I'm on it. --Qsaw ^(talk) 21:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Cool! Tons of kudos and a warm welcome to Wikipedia from me to you.--Odd M. Nilsen 14:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm done with repairing the links. --Qsaw ^(talk) 17:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inner belt

You had removed "Inner belt" from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Corsetry http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inner_belt

why?Haabet 18:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Because Inner Belt redirects to Interstate 695 (Massachusetts) which is an highway and has nothing to do with corsetry. --Qsaw ^(talk) 09:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving the slayer

I've seen that you showed an interest to move slayer to the slayer (band), but you came across an misunderstanding from other editors, perhapes because most (if not all) of them might might be the fans of the band Slayer, so it is understandable why do they want to keep it in the old way. Well, discussion about it is opened at the talk page.

Good luck. :) --Qsaw ^(talk) 10:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I added the user talk page discussion above the move, and started a "discussion" section as well. I personally have no opinion on the move, and was merely "helping out" at WP:RM. Hope you're having a great day : ) - jc37 17:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for help in discussion about moving slayer to the slayer (band) :). I've rerequested the move in WP:RM under the "Other proposals" section, and there is an dicsussion at the talk page of the article in question.

However, I do not intent to assume bad faith, but I'm afraid that most of the participants of the discussion will be ILIKEIT-driven fans who want to keep the "high position" of the band's article. OTHERSTUFF arguments are also likely to appear, as seen in previous discussion.

I'm not sure how to handle it. --Qsaw ^(talk) 20:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources always trump WP:ILIKEIT. Just WP:AGF (while remembering the encoldened text on that page), stay civil, and practice WP:EQ. Hope this helps : ) - jc37 22:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corset

Can you help my by the corset article?

The word "Corset" been common in English after the Great Exhibition in 1851. Because a scandal. A woman abuse her husbands name to get the one of only two prize in invention. In that era it was a humiliation of all English men, particular the stay-markers who have their livelihood of make pair of stays. The new was as she replace the shoulder straps by diagonal bone in the back, but the best new was as she make the corset after the shape the woman's trunk. Opposite the stay-maker who make the pair of stays after the newest fashion. The judge argument for the prize by the words: "Corsets ingeniously adapted for giving support to the trunk without confinement to the thorax." Haabet 09:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)