Talk:QFT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "quoted for truth"
I've noticed that the history page for this article frequently omitts and re-admits the reference to this internet slang term. I do believe it's a fairly common term that, while not deserving of its own article, at least deserves a mention on this disambiguation page. If there is any debate as to whether it should be kept or removed, let it be discussed here before action is taken. Pele Merengue 17:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I just looked up this very page to find out what someone meant when they said "QFT" in a post I read, and was happy to find the (correct) explanation here. It should definitely stay.--4.231.244.4 00:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- I was in the same boat, and it is nice to get a definition. 24.149.23.119 17:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ditto. That's the definition I was looking for, and there's no good reason it shouldn't be here. Obdurodon 14:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- I was in the same boat, and it is nice to get a definition. 24.149.23.119 17:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
can we stop documenting retarded internet acronyms on wikipedia, please (unsigned by 24.50.11.1 on 06-Feb-2007, attribution added by Obdurodon)
- No. (unsigned by 24.149.23.119 on 09-Apr-2007, attribution added by Obdurodon)
- Agreed, no. This isn't about attaching value judgements to the facts, it's about presenting them, and the fact is that the "retarded internet acronym" is one of the most common usages for this particular string of letters. Who gets to decide what's "retarded" anyway? Someone on some "retarded internet encyclopedia"? That's the way many view Wikipedia. How is that an unacceptable characterization while yours is not? Obdurodon 14:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
ok internet whatever you say —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.108.101.237 (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Quality friend time? Now that is just made up.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.245.254 (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
agreed
(64.231.134.129 (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC))
the term "+1" has nothing to do with this.
[edit] in toto? what is that?
hhmmm..? 77.125.90.238 (talk) 00:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

