Template:QF-NPOV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on June 9, 2008, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:
had an obviously non-neutral treatment of a topic
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to WP:Neutral point of view, "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly, proportionately and without bias."
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.
Template documentation
|
[edit] Usage summary
{{subst:QF-NPOV}}— ~~~~
With optional comments
{{subst:QF-NPOV|comments = }}— ~~~~
[edit] See also
- {{QF-unstable}} - for articles that are victims of edit wars, or discuss a future event
- {{QF-tags}} - for articles that contain cleanup tags
- {{QF-source}} - for articles with too few references
[edit] Note
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When using certain templates on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Thank you.
 |
This template employs intricate features of template syntax.
You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with its setup and parser functions before editing the template. If your edit causes unexpected problems, please undo it quickly, as this template may appear on a large number of pages.
Remember that you can conduct experiments, and should test all improvements, in either the general Template sandbox or your user space before changing anything here. |
