Talk:Punnett square
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia is not a how to. That means that this article needs to be cleaned up so that is isn't a how-to. AndyZ 02:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- The section "Interpreting a punnet square" is really "how to make a punnet square" but it is valuable information and I don't think it should be deleted. Dr d12 20:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)dr_d12
-
- Agree with dr_d12 (72.141.120.45 22:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC))
Contents |
[edit] Link recommendation
Perhaps there should be some pointer or classifcation to genetic theories, applications, or genetic mutation? Vandykee 23:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "disfigured" alleles
I removed the following from "Situtations where punnet squares don't apply"
-
- a parent has a disfigured copy of the allele in question.
Does anyone know what this means? Tocharianne 03:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- It was vandalism added in the Revision of 22:04, 11 April 2007 by 24.199.66.233. - Dr d12 16:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Semi-protection?
Nearly 100% of the recent edits on this article are IP vandalism and the reverting of IP vandalism. Would anyone object to semi-protection? I know we can keep reverting by hand, but it seems like a waste of effort on an article that remains rather static and is not being actively improved. EdJohnston (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Genetics
There was a brief war of the bots; the project tag was added and removed. I just restored the tag, since we can all agree that this is a topic in Genetics. I also removed some old random stuff at the top of the page. EdJohnston (talk) 03:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

