Talk:Punk visual art

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

This page does not exist for the purpose of self-promotion. Joseph Nechvatal (or his daughter) are abusing the spirit and integrity of wikipedia. Relevance to punk visual art is not for any artist, willy-nilly, to declare. Artists such as Winston Smith (artist), for example, have strong affinities with the punk community, including the Dead Kennedys (for whom he did album covers). Although punk is certainly an open category, it should not serve as a platform for self-promotion. --Dylanfly 16:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

You should try to work Raymond Pettibon into here. Gaohoyt (talk) 00:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GSTQ cover.jpg

Image:GSTQ cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)