Talk:Pseudophysics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Division of Articles
This dividing articles into skeptics and general is not very neutral, especially as the "general" manuscript is apparently skeptical of psuedophysics. Salsb 21:35, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] From PNA/Physics
- Pseudophysics - A new article created by an anon. The article itself seems okay, but there has been dispute over the reference section Salsb 21:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Division of Main and Related and Other
Since pseudophysics is a subcategory of pseudoscience, it should be related. Salsb 21:35, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- Salsb, many mainstream theories are untestable or cannot be falsified. String theory for one. But the Higgs Boson anf the many-worlds interpretation would be examples of this article. They probably should be includedd in the category too. 165.201.42.84 20:36, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
-
- String theory is testable in principle.--Brentt 20:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not pseudophysics
How should we categorize and describe theories of physics (and other sciences) which are scientifically plausible, scientifically tested, but not (currently) accepted by the scientific community? "Unproven science theories"? -Willmcw 04:38, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

