Talk:Prisionera
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an attempt to build consistent guidelines for articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating. |
from VfD:
As for Anita no te rajes above. Deb 17:25, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Soap operas are minor (sorry, Mike H), and then this is Spanish language. The notability for an anglophone encyclopedia is lowered by that. Geogre 18:56, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I disagree that the fact that the EN-Wikipedia is in English should imply that topics should be in any way judged based on *their* language specificity. That said, this article is poorly written. I rewrote it as a better stub (poked around for basic info). Hopefully someone will fill in a lot more info, or can tell us if it's notable. Keep --Improv 20:12, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)
-
- And my point is that we serve the English speaking community. EN is not the master or the true Wikipedia. There should be a great deal of content on .SE or .CZ or .JA that isn't appropriate to .EN. That's not because it's not good information: it's because the items under description are not notable in the Anglophone world. It's not a value judgment. Do you think that the .DE folks are going to wonder about whether my new Peachoid is useful to them? I hope they don't. Geogre 01:24, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I always saw Wikipedia's different languages as being just a result of the fact that we don't all speak all languages fluently. Similarly, I think of EN as the "Wikipedia IN English", not "Wikipedia for the English". I don't see why one's language necessarily indicates what one will be interested in -- are Australians going to be interested in your Peachoid? Are Parisians likely to find towns in Quebec interesting? I do find this to be an interesting topic though, and am interested in further dialogue on it, in or outside this VFD. --Improv 17:38, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- And my point is that we serve the English speaking community. EN is not the master or the true Wikipedia. There should be a great deal of content on .SE or .CZ or .JA that isn't appropriate to .EN. That's not because it's not good information: it's because the items under description are not notable in the Anglophone world. It's not a value judgment. Do you think that the .DE folks are going to wonder about whether my new Peachoid is useful to them? I hope they don't. Geogre 01:24, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:59, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, send to cleanup. Any show on Telemundo is encyclopedia-worthy. -- Jmabel 00:49, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. -Sean Curtin 03:01, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not true that any show on any network or syndicate is necessarily encyclopedia-worthy of an article. If this show is either very popular or attains a cult popularity and a good article appears, then that good article would belong here. Jallan 19:46, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, send to clean-up. RMG 22:53, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion'
