Talk:Prenuptial agreement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

added pop culture Should we have it?58.178.199.22 00:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 proper subject matter 1.1 Pop culture 1.2 Religious canon law 1.3 Example 2 Template on article 3 Alimony

[edit] proper subject matter

[edit] Pop culture

I don't think pop culture should be in a law article. But pre-nupts are a popular discussion point so we need a general pre-nupt article that is not legalese and retitle this article say "Pre-nuptial agreement (legal aspects)" or something just as specific. Any comments? Erisa Goss 21:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Religious canon law

I do not think Catholic Church law should be a proper subtopic. It may be provided as a tangential point to motovate a link to a separate article on church law which may compare how say hindu, protestant, Catholic, jewish or muslim religions treat pre-nupts. I think the section should be reworded to say that it is not law but church teaching and NOT BINDING or deleted. Erisa Goss 21:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Example

Could someone give an example of what a pre-nuptial agreement might actually say, and explain why it is necessary to have in that instance? Zargulon 15:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template on article

I was running through recent changes and came across this article. I noted the template at the top stating that this article may not represent a world view. The article says the same thing, in not so many words. I kinda think the template is redundant. Normally I'd be bold and remove it, however, I'll ask the more knowledgeable. Does this template appear to be redundant and almost a disclaimer? If so, should it be removed ? THanks KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 17:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alimony

Can a Prenupitial agreement include a clause stating that in the occasion of a divorce, the parties involved do not have to pay alimony? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.195.105 (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)