Talk:Powerful class cruiser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): British military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): World War I task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub	rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] What a mess

What an astonishing mess this article (and particularly the tables) are. I have moved data that belongs to the individual ships to where they belong in the ship articles, but retained the cost comparison and the comparative performance table. If the BNA revised it's costs downwards in 1906 then presumably they had reason to do so and we should accept those costs - but I retained the note.--Geronimo20 (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)