Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 May 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2

[edit] Image:1161808402.jpg

No evidence of a CC license from the source page. Polly (Parrot) 01:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Castle_jeremy_fc.jpg

Promotional image - No evidence of OTRS filing Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Commons image showing through -Nv8200p talk 22:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Keep of Kalessin.jpg

invalid fair-use claim Chubbles (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jan Fischer.jpg

Permission from author is claimed but no evidence of such, ie an OTRS ticket Number. Polly (Parrot) 15:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tifdlogo.gif

This is a logo that is not GFDL. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 19:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jeffdunham.jpg

Image of a living person. Fair use can't be used. Corvus cornixtalk 19:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MRMULLIGAN.JPG

Image tagged norightsreserved, but photo dates from the 1930s and no reason to assume that it's entered the public domain. The web site listed as the source is a geocities page that claims copyright 1999, but doesn't provide a photo credit. — Rlandmann (talk) 20:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OrbitalVert.JPG

Sdrtirs (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:OrbitalGreenone.JPG

CD artwork. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Zakstarkeywho.jpg

The picture was tagged as being under non commercial use (That's the case on flickr). However, since it is here for almost 6 months I think the license might have changed on flickr meanwhile -- lucasbfr talk 23:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Obama osama.jpg

This image is non-free. (Completing process started by Loonymonkey.) →Wordbuilder (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

It probably should be removed since it is not vital to the article it now illustrates, Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008. Too bad some else didn't snap a picture of it while it was posted. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Delete. It isn't vital to the article and the article centering on the church itself was deleted as non-notable. →Wordbuilder (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

DELLEETE THIS SHIT. RACIST BASTARDS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.171.107 (talk • contribs) May 3, 2008

Delete as well. Not important, possibly unencyclopedic, not a vital pic. (To IP Address 97.82.171.107, you need to watch your mouth and check the spelling often. You could commit a mistake, by the way.) -iaNLOPEZ1115 · TaLKBaCK · Vandalize it 07:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)