Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 August 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] August 8
[edit] Image:Choke day 1 front.jpg
This is a production schedule for Choke (film) scanned in by an editor to release into the public domain. Seeing that there is no indication that the purported schedule is meant to be publicized and that the editor himself does not indicate that he created the document him/herself, the image does not seem appropriate to be had on Wikipedia. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mythclass1.jpg
This is a panel of a copyrighted comics. There is no evidence the uploader can release this image to public domain. bluemask (talk) 03:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Landrockpacific.png
Image description: "Landrock Pacific Bank Logo from the Movie "Firewall" starring Harrison Ford." If this were created based on a logo from the film, that's probably a derivitive work and falls under copyright. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Malays.JPG
It's possibly unfree images (pictures of famous persons), combined with an image editor into this image, and then it is said GFDL by the author. It cannot be said GFDL if components of the images are taken from possibly copyrighted ones. — — Indon (reply) — 10:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Malays1.JPG
As per Indon above "It's possibly unfree images (pictures of famous persons), combined with an image editor into this image, and then it is said GFDL by the author. It cannot be said GFDL if components of the images are taken from possibly copyrighted ones." — — (Caniago 11:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Image:Christina_ricci.jpg
Appears to be WP:SPA using {{MultilicenseFromowner}} to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. Further, image is orphaned. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 14:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dante_Medusa2.jpg
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Fanimatrixkick.jpg
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Faniagent.jpg
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Iran.Karbaschi.jpg
Image is claimed to be fair use, but is from a living person, and is hence replacable. The source of the image is also not promotional material. — roozbeh 17:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Image:Geneweingarten.jpg
Permission is not required according to image talk, but no mention of commercial/non commercial and derivative works. Garion96 (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I specifically mentioned that I was using this picture for Wikipedia when I called. Does that make any difference? betakate 12:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Vag.gif
Contains copyrighted image Image:VW-Logo.png; making the image unlikely for GFDL licensing. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept - retagged. Nonadmin closure. The Evil Spartan 04:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Howard_L._Lance.jpg
No evidence of claimed {{GFDL}} licensing. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
