Talk:Posthumous sperm retrieval

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Ethics

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Posthumous sperm retrieval article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

To-do list for Posthumous sperm retrieval:

edit · history · watch · refresh

Go through the prose with a fine-toothed comb. There are going to be numerous errors both factual and typographical as the primary author typed most of this (including the to-do list) whilst under the influence. Try to find some concrete stats on the number of procedures run in a given year. Are they becoming more or less common? Expand the legal section - find specific legislature for the "Bob was there too" countries in the list. Add examples not currently on the list. A more relevant picture, perhaps?

A fact from Posthumous sperm retrieval appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on July 3, 2007.

[edit] Pre-emptive disclaimer

I wrote this article after noticing the rather odd title on a list in WP:RA. I have exactly zero expertise in the fields described within the article and had never heard of the procedure prior to starting work on it. If you have any alterations you feel need making, please feel free to make them. If they're unsourced, I'll probably contact you on your talk page asking about 'em or just look them up for myself. There are bound to be numerous errors or overgeneralisations within the text. Remember Hanlon's Razor - it's unlikely any mistakes I've made are malicious. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 00:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)