Talk:Post-anarchism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Discussion

Ok what is meant by the rejection of the repressive hypothesis? surely such an emphasis on focault would recognize this discourse?

--Foucault, as one example, traced the history of sexuality and argued that we typically assume that our sexuality has been repressed. To think in these terms suggests that power is purely repression and serves no creative role. The political implications are amazing. see this page for a simple explanation: http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/histofsex/section1.html

[edit] Criticism

There is at least one essay, Cohn and Wilbur: "What's Wrong With Postanarchism?" dealing with some of the shortcomings of the approach. Libertatia 21:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Would like to see the link to the institute for anarchist studies removed as one can not find anything about post-anarchism on their website any longer. There was a short-lived raging debate, however the site has lost all traces of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.227.229 (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Post-Anarchism Reader

Sureyyya Evren, and not Jason Adams, is the co-editor of the post-anarchism Reader.

• I moved this unsigned post from the top of the page. Zazaban (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)