Talk:Positivity/negativity ratio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Asked context was already given on February 26, 2006. Is it better now?
Isn't this just original research? The author seems to be using wikipedia for self-promotion... Note his paper with Frederickson suggests the need for a "theory of positivity" and then leaps into 7 predictions, skipping over what that theory might be or how it might be validated.

