Talk:Port-Royal Logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Logic Related task forces (major fields): Philosophical literature Related task forces (periods): Modern philosophy

Is this the same as the "Port Royal Grammar" mentioned in linguistic works? AnonMoos (talk) 08:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)