Talk:Politics of Estonia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Politics of Estonia is part of the WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Link confusion
Why does the People's Party Moderates (Rahvaerakond Mõõdukad) link to the Social Democratic Party (Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond)? Similarly, why does the Estonian Social Democratic Labour Party (Eesti Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Tööpartei) link to the Estonian Left Party (Eesti Vasakpartei)? If these are the same, you Estonians should really clear up the naming of these articles in English. It seems there's no norm. Joffeloff 19:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well if you would have read the article for either of thes parties, you would have seen that the parties changed their names after the elction took place. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- This is farcical. How did someone put the Centre party as centre-left and the ESDP as centre? To my mind, American Democratic Party, a social liberal party would not be more left than a social-democratic party. Dogru144 15:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- That is actually how they are. The Centre Party is not intended to support centrist policies; instead, its original full name was 'The Central Party of People', akin to the Sovietese 'Central Committee of Planning'. Digwuren 11:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- This is farcical. How did someone put the Centre party as centre-left and the ESDP as centre? To my mind, American Democratic Party, a social liberal party would not be more left than a social-democratic party. Dogru144 15:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Border treaty
According to the international law, the border treaty is still signed, but not ratified. So, it's not correct to say, that treaty was nullified. Russian Parliament may ratify this treaty anytime he wants without any bilateral step. Also, according to the international law the Parliament can't add anything to the treaty itself. The preambula was added to the ratification act (that's mean to the domestic legal act, which internationally could be equal to the declaration), not to the treaty.
