Talk:Point Blank (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Questions

From my memory, there seem to be a number of flaws in the description of the plot.

1) "Walker...shot by his adulterous wife" I didn't think it was certain that they were actually married.

2) I thought it wasn't his wife that shot him, it was Reese.

3) "Walker pursues his money in a series of murders..." Few, if any, of the deaths, are directly caused by Walker. Reese is killed by accident, and three guys are killed by the sniper arranged by the Organisation. Walker may have some indirect responsibility for their deaths, but he doesn't actually kill any of them.

Does anyone agree / disagree with this ? If there are no objections, I will change the article accordingly. GeraldH 08:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


1) Firstly, it is Reese that shoots Walker to death in the prison cell at Alcatraz (see below).

2) According to Director John Boorman (in a retrospective discussion of Lee Marvin which I once saw on TV), Walker is a ghost. This, perhaps, is why he never actually kills anyone, and also explains why, when he confronts his ex, he never actually converses with her, but rather she "converses" with herself. ARog —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARog (talkcontribs) 19:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, poor Walker actually is a ghost. One of the unique contributions of this film is that Boorman gives us a ghost's experience: less consistent or understandable than life is for the living. Less real. Very cool. Funny how the critics can miss this!Vendrov 10:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PointBlankPoster.jpg

Image:PointBlankPoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)