Talk:Point-of-view gun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

42, the Meaning of Life This article is part of WikiProject Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Should this article be called a stub? Is it a topic that merits an entire article? Apol0gies 04:42, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Prior appearance(s)

I've noticed the edit war over this device. I've heard the radio play, seen the BBC television series and read the books. I know that this device appears in one of them, but only the Guide entry of it. Someone needs to look up chapter and verse of this occurance and put it in the article so that this silly edit war ends. Val42 03:00, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

I've read the books and listened to the radio series, and it's not in eiter of them, so it must be in the television series. --Dani 16:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
The POV gun is most definitely mentioned (though not actively used) in one of the HHG books.
Unfortunately, I don't own any of the books (except Salmon of Doubt); I borrowed them from the
library. It (the POVG) may have been mentioned in the TV series, too; I don't remember. [Berney]
8:14 PM Eastern 11/29/06
Vague recollections do not an encyclopedia make. Exec producer of the movie and longtime friend of Douglas Adams is on record (see article footnotes) that the device is new and unique to this version of the story - in fact, that's the very reason it's notable and warrants its own entry. Until someone can reference the specific book, radio show, TV series, towel, game or comic in which the POV gun supposedly appears, could we all agree that Mr. Stamp knows what he's talking about? SDS 02:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
No, the gun definitely appeared in the books. The exec. producer was either making a joke, is an idiot or was downright lying when he said it was unique to the film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.72.105 (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Future sequels

These last two points may provide clues for the direction of any possible sequels.

I don't think that's the best sentence to end the entry on. It's unlikely that there are going to be sequels, because the scripts aren't going to be written by Douglas Adams, and the whole h2g2 would erupt with hatred towards whomever decided to take on the job themselves. Rotten1 00:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hgg zooey.jpg

Image:Hgg zooey.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)