User talk:Poemsnewly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm a newbie and yet you blocked me, you should block FunkeyFly, he made me do 3 reverts"

Decline reason: "You are responsible for your own actions. If you are not willing to accept this, please let us know so we can block you indefinitely. — Yamla 19:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Warning

Do not revert Template:Slavic languages again or you will violate Wikipedia:3RR, and will be blocked.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:FunkyFly, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the 3 reversion rule. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Very wrong, you should block also FunkyFly, he did the same.--Poemsnewly 18:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I did not revert more than 3 times, and you did Bonaparte.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
He only reverted 3 times which is not breaking the rule. However, being you did, i reverted it to the previous state. Please do not engage in edit wars once this block expires. Should you violate the rule again, the block time will be lengthened. Thank you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

←You were given a warning, which you read, then removed as "trolling". You understood what you were doing. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

One moment please, I gave him the possibility to talk on page. He refused it. I said don't blind revert on talk page. He ignored it. Instead he warned me on my own page. I warned him also. --Poemsnewly 18:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Bonaparte, you can twist it all you want. Your edits are totally unsourced and were removed.   /FunkyFly.talk_  18:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
The fact is, he stopped at 3, you continued. in 24 hours, it will expuire. you were warned, you knew what you were doing and did it anyways. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris, you don't see? I saw that he didn't want any discussion. He could have answered on talk page if he wanted. He refused any dialog. Why didn't he replied to my invitation of dialog on talk page where I said "don't blind revert?" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ASlavic_languages&diff=117088561&oldid=111451745 --Poemsnewly 18:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I stay out of edit conflicts. I really dont care who said what. you could have stopped, given it 24 hours and if you wanted gone at it again. There are plenty of ways to handle disputes and knwoingly going against policies is not the way to do that. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
He reverted my tag
This article may be too long.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page, if necessary split the content into subarticles and keep this article in a summary style.

even if the article exeeds 50k.Poemsnewly 19:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FunkyFly

[edit] Ciao

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Khoikhoi 04:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)