User talk:Playshogi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sho shogi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razorflame Report false positives 02:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of 横行

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 22:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] shogi variants

Please don't add nonsense to articles as you have with Yari shogi, Chu shogi, Dai shogi, Cannon shogi, and Sho shogi. —kwami (talk) 22:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, you caught some errors there. Thank you. However, please discuss changes that have been reversed before restoring them. The rules in the Japanese articles and the conventions of English contradict the changes you made to Dai shogi, for example.

It's getting really annoying following you around reverting your edits. Would you please verify changes before you make them? Out of 6 8 articles you edited today, 5 7 needed to be reverted, and some were completely nonsensical, like turning one row of a chessboard blue. So far I've been reviewing your edits to see which are worth keeping, but if this keeps up, I'll start just blindly reverting everything you do. kwami (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)