User talk:Player 03
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Player 03, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Unknown User (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've been editing for a year and a half, but thanks for the welcome. Player 03 (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] so sorry
My article about Eloisa needs you or any other user to contribute in order for it to become more interesting. Eloisa is a recognized woman, and since she is, she must be in WIKIPEDIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Petronasalicante (talk • contribs) 23:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fast Puppy
Fast puppy. Puppy loves me some Huggle. --Bfigura's puppy (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] grr
How could you?? this is how Nazi Germany started, burning my books! I have no record of what I wrote, you heartless fiend! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tackyjasper (talk • contribs) 01:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Badminton Victoria State Pennant
Hi, this article seems to be back - Badminton Victoria State Pennant. Is it much the same as when you nominated it earlier? I don't want to tag it if the author is making some effort at improvement. Cheers Kevin (talk) 02:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have actually nominated it for deletion as a resurrected article. It would need to have an impressive amount of information to be acceptable after being deleted once. Player 03 (talk) 03:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- It probably would have been better to use the same criteria A7 you did originally. WP:CSD#G4 doesn't apply to articles that were speedy deleted, only those deleted after a community consensus. Still, the result is the same. There's another of his/her articles on my watchlist somewhere that hasn't improved either. I guess that's next. Kevin (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- You have a point there. I'm still a little inexperienced with judging new articles and especially with selecting appropriate tags. I'm learning a few things, though, and hopefully I'll make better choices in the future (and avoid things like the incident above). Player 03 (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- It probably would have been better to use the same criteria A7 you did originally. WP:CSD#G4 doesn't apply to articles that were speedy deleted, only those deleted after a community consensus. Still, the result is the same. There's another of his/her articles on my watchlist somewhere that hasn't improved either. I guess that's next. Kevin (talk) 04:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] June 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Non-dropframe (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was not the author of the article. I added that deletion tag in the first place. Player 03 (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- I apologize for my mistake. --Non-dropframe (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy Deletion of Lil T
Before you remove tags you deem inappropriate, you may want to read through the article and see that, while the article claims he started his career in 2008, he already claims to have been associated with Leonardo DiCaprio and had a drug addiction problem. Sounds like he copy and pasted his biography from someone else's to me. ;) Redfarmer (talk) 02:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I would personally consider that to be nonsense rather than vandalism. Also, I was removing the tag to place what I considered a more accurate one. Either way, the article was deleted. Player 03 (talk) 02:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not to press the issue, but the deleting admin agreed with me apparently. Just be careful removing other people's tags if they are appropriate. There's many times that an article could technically be deleted for several different reasons. In this case, the best reason is that it was a hoax. Redfarmer (talk) 02:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

