Talk:Planetary protection
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] More Objective
Revised final sentence so that it was more objective and did not make a subjective statement. Lucid-dream 05:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] References
- C. Mileikowsky, F. A. Cucinotta, J. W. Wilson, B. Gladman, G. Horneck, L. Lindegren, J. Melosh, Hans Rickman, M. Valtonen, J. Q. Zheng (2000). "Risks threatening viable transfer of microbes between bodies in our solar system". Planetary and Space Science 48 (11): 1107-1115. doi:.
- Rummel J. D., Billings L. (2004). "Issues in planetary protection: policy, protocol and implementation". Space Policy 20 (1): 49-54. doi:.
--Stone 09:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Benton C. Clark (2004). "Temperature–time issues in bioburden control for planetary protection". Advances in Space Research 34 (11): 2314-2319. doi:.
- A. Debus (2004). "Estimation and assessment of Mars contamination". Advances in Space Research 35 (9): 1648-1653. doi:.
- J. Nellen, P. Rettberg, G. Horneck and W.R. Streit (2006). "Planetary protection – Approaching uncultivable microorganisms". Advances in Space Research 38 (6): 1266-1270. doi:.
- L. I. Tennen (2006). "Evolution of the planetary protection policy: conflict of science and jurisprudence". Advances in Space Research 34 (11): 2354-2362. doi:.
- L. Perek (2006). "Planetary protection: lessons learned". Advances in Space Research 34 (11): 2354-2362. doi:.
- J. D. Rummel, P. D. Stabekis, D. L. Devincenzi, J. B. Barengoltz (2002). "COSPAR's planetary protection policy: A consolidated draft". Advances in Space Research 30 (6): 1567-1571. doi:.
- D. L. DeVincenzi, P. Stabekis and J. Barengoltz (1996). "Refinement of planetary protection policy for Mars missions". Advances in Space Research 18 (1-2): 311-316. doi:.
- J. Barengoltz and P. D. Stabekis (1983). "U.S. planetary protection program: Implementation highlights". Advances in Space Research 3 (8): 5-12. doi:.
- L. P. Daspit, J. A. Stern, E. M. Cortright (1975). "Viking heat sterilization—Progress and problems". Acta Astronautica 2 (7-8): 649-666. doi:.
- [1]
- so... what are these doing here? Potatoswatter 01:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] moved statement
This was added by an anon, I'm moving it here mainly because the grammar makes me wonder about veracity:
For Category I only a request to COSPAR has to be made. There are no restrictions on the bioburden, as long a acidental landing in a place beeing Category II to V is impossible.
Potatoswatter 01:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

