Talk:Pittsburgh Light Rail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Streetcars.
An editor has requested that an image be added to this article. Please work with the Images task force to add a suitable image to this article. Once the requested image is added, remove the Imageneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this image request.
Pittsburgh Light Rail is part of WikiProject Pittsburgh, which is building a comprehensive guide to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.

Editors are currently needed to tag Pittsburgh-related articles with {{pghproj}}.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Google Maps

Google maps has just added a bunch of info about T stations. They are displayed on the map and if you click on the station it gives you a schedule of departures (pf unverified quality).

Here is a my map I have created of some of the stations.

In order to integrate the Wiki pages about stations with a Google Map (or Mapplet), I suggest that a Wiki page be created that contains a table containing all the information about all the stations. I have no idea if Wiki pages about trains & maps do anything like this for other regions.

That table can then be used to automagically (via some unknown software) generate Wiki pages for the individual stations AND a Google Map of all the stations, with appropriate cross links between the two.

I'm now going to edit the Pittsburgh Light Rail page to add a Google Maps section. If somebody doesn't like it, it can always be taken out.

I'm removing it, since we wouldn't add information like "Rand McNally shows Amtrak stations on their maps". --NE2 03:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
umm, Google Maps provides station clickable info about current departures which Rand McNally doesn't. Also each entry for an individual station links to maps for that station so why should there not be a top-level link to a map of all stations? It seems that you want to be neutral and not favor Google. So be it. Maybe there is a neutral way to include various map services that mark all stations and provide current info, but at the moment Google is the only one that can deliver. I'll defer to a general consensus, however I think it is good to promote a new capability, even in imperfect form, rather that wait for some ultimate solution that is neutral. I created my Google map of T stations when I wanted to take the T (which I rarely do) and found the Wiki info more helpful on the current rigamarole needed to get to Mt. Lebanon than the official PAT pages. And yes, I added the main page link as some sort of a challenge. I.e. it is straightforward to create by hand a Google Map that shows stations. However to cross link that map with Wiki pages on stations takes more effort which should be automated. I favor putting a link to an incomplete imperfect Google map on the main page as a challenge for someone to construct the perfect complete one and/or show how to do it in other mapping services. However from your expressed opinion it seems like you would delete any external map of all stations.
I don't think it's useful to say which map services include it. Is there something like [1] that we can add to external links? --NE2 04:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] shortest

reportedly the shortest subway? shorter ones have existed in the past, but what about ones in operation today? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.201.18.104 (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

  • Well, it's not a subway so much as a light rail system that runs in a tunnel. Just off the top of my head, though, I can't think of a metro system with a shorter underground portion. Mackensen (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)