Talk:Pilot in command

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Since this page seems to be about a legal concept common to many jurisdictions, I think that should be made clear in the first sentence somehow. Also I don't think the sentence, "The PIC must be legally certified to operate the aircraft for the specific flight and flight conditions, but need not be actually manipulating the controls at any given moment." is strictly true. There are times the PIC needs no certification, for example, PICs of ultralight aircraft in the United States need none. 67.160.147.2 (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Pilot in command

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search