Talk:Pictorial Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Why this article exists

This is for the deletionists out there: This article exists because it had over 20 legitimate inbound red-links and had a circulation of millions. That makes it notable. davidwr (talk) 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Needs expansion

This article needs:

  • Publication information for its entire history.
  • List of major contributors and contributions. Some are listed on the What Links Here page.
  • Historical significance of the magazine. What makes it notable besides its wide circulation and the fact that it has over 20 inbound links?
  • An example cover or two. The earlier the better to avoid copyright issues.
  • Changes in the magazine's content over the years

Be WP:BOLD. davidwr (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)