User:Physchim62/PD-AU timeline

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Date	{{PD-Australia}}	Template talk	WP:AWNB
2006 Sept. 1		11:47 Physchim62}} proposes changes to include the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 104A [1]
2007 July 19	10:06 Astrokey44 (talk · contribs) impliments changes proposed by Physchim62 and unopposed on talk page[2]
20		03:57 Rebecca politely queries changes [3]
		13:39 Gnagarra replies, correctly describing the situation as per Australian copyright law but not addressing the question of U.S. copyright law [4]
		14:19 Physchim62 points out difference between Australian and US law [5]
22		00:45 Gnagarra makes the common mistake that "Once an image is in the Public domain then that is applied world wide" [6]
		02:08 Gnagarra makes a good-faith misinterpretation of U.S. Copyright Office circulars 38b and 15a [7]
23			04:47 Blnguyen remarks that the tag has changed [8]
	05:16 Rebecca reverts changes to {{PD-Australia}} per WP:AWNB [9]		05:16 Rebecca reports reversion[10]
			05:19 Gnagarra reports the discussion, "the editor who changed the template hasnt responded to the information I provided with sources" [11]
			07:29 Hesperian agrees with Rebecca and Gnagarra[12]
		09:56 Astrokey44 attemps to correct Gnagarra's misconceptions [13]
			10:00 Nick Dowling "This looks to have been a classic case of well-meaning copyright paranoia" [14]
			10:40 Rebecca says that the discussion is maybe not over, refers to "the French guy" [15]
		11:31 Physchim62 adds to Astrokey44's comments [16]
	14:35 Physchim62 reinstantes Astrokey44's changes[17]
	14:37 Physchim62 protects copyright tag "at the more conservative version"[18]
		17:01 Gnagarra claims to be offended by Physchim62's actions, states that they “are rather pointless as both Rebecca and myself are admins” [19]
24			01:27 Gnagarra accuses Physchim62 of "complete disregard for for what is expect of an admin and a total lack of good faith" [20]
	01:43 Rebecca removes protection [21]
		01:47 Rebecca accuses Physchim62 of “a flagrant abuse of admin powers” [22]
			01:50 Rebecca claims Physchim62's (sic) changes "essentially broke the template, adding a 'this should be deleted' tag to every Australian public domain image", accuses Physchim62 of "sheer stubborn incompetence" [23]
			02:35 JRG comments, asking for more professional legal advice [24]
			03:33 Orderinchaos comments[25]
			10:24 Astrokey44 comments[26]
			11:22 Nick Dowling claims that the discussion is being conducted by "bush lawyers" [27]
		15:09 Physchim62 replies to allegations by Gnagarra and Rebecca [28]
		15:46 Jheald suggests splitting the template [29]
			15:54 Fred.e [30]
		19:46 Physchim62 replies [31]
			20:42 Physchim62 objects to the term "bush lawyers" points out that AWNB is perhaps not the best forum [32]
			22:45 Thewinchester accuses Physchim62 of bad faith [33]
			22:58 Physchim62 suggests an appropriate forum[34]
25			02:34 Orderinchaos claims that Physchim62's comment is ironic [35]
		04:50 Rebecca claims that the changes are tagging every image as non-PD [36]
	04:51 Rebecca reverts Physchim62 "getting rid of the incorrect addition" [37]
		19:35 Iamunknown corrects Rebecca's misconception [38]
26		01:31 Rebecca replies [39]
	12:17 Physchim62 reverts Rebecca as no consensus for changes [40]
	12:18 Physchim62 reprotects copyright tag[41]
		12:23 Physchim62 asks for time to reach consensus instead of repeated reversions [42]
27	01:11 Kylu removes protection from {{PD-Australia}} "requested by Rebecca" [43]
	01:13 Rebecca reverts Physchim62 [44]
		01:20 Rebecca accuses Physchim62 of a second flagrant abuse of admin powers [45]
		12:26 Physchim62 replies, with link to new page Template talk:PD-Australia/U.S. copyright issues [46]
28		01:12 Rebecca accepts explanation [47]