Talk:Photogenic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
I'm not quite sure that this is a dictionary entry, since it does (tentatively at least) try to explain why some are more photogenic than others.
[edit] Image?
A photograph of a person widely known for being photogenic, and must be sourced and have a neutral pov. I chose Jolie because she is a popular sex symbol in women, and also because some user (who probably has yet to see her in rl) keeps adding her image in the Physical attractiveness and Sex symbol articles.
- User:Carie
[edit] rm uncited claim
I removed the following claim from the article, because it is uncited (and dubious): "This phenomenon is caused by the three dimensional and two dimensional polarizing effect and could explain why a person looks "better" in two dimensions than in three or vice versa."--Srleffler 07:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
