Talk:PFC Levski Sofia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on PFC Levski Sofia is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Bulgaria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bulgaria-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing! | |||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. | |||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||
 |
To-do list for PFC Levski Sofia: | edit · history · watch · refresh | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
I've done some more cleaning up, but it still needs further work. Particularly,
- Until 1921 no football championship was carried on.
- Levski is on 69th place in "Top100" - rankings of the clubs participated in the European Club Tournaments since their establishing in 1955.
Could someone reword/expand on these bits if you can? -N (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
I changed the formatting of the nicknames in Famous Players as per River Plate. - N 22:36, 23 October 2005
eeh, i reorganized it a bit in the hope that now it will meet the "quality standards" :0 got logged off - Trunchanin
Contents |
[edit] Badge
There seems to be some dispute on which is the "real badge" of the club. The official website uses only the new one, but I seem to recall there was some not-so-recent controversy or reintroduction of the old badge for some reason. Can anyone explain the matter, so we could be sure which one to use? 
→ Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → 17:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- The new badge
- The old badge
- I saw the issue was discussed in Bulgarian on this talk page: User talk:Trunchanin. According to the user, the new page had been introduced for legal reasons that shortly after that had been resolved. It has, however, remained in use to some extent (together with the old one that the fans favour) because it is one-colour and thus cheaper to print. Still, it seems the old badge is the official one after all. → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → 17:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Plamenj 15:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC) It is the new badge (blue-white) that is the club official regardless of what fans fovour. It is shown both on team kits and official documentation.
- Your uninformed opinion is not welcomed. Please come back when you study the facts.---Trunchanin 13:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] International success
Should we go ahead and scrap the listing of teams knocked-out in order to reach the QF? It just takes too much space and I'm not really sure if it has any relevance. Instead just stating Levski has reached the QF in this and that year, in what tournament, and close w/ listing what records the team holds. 14 games and 7 wins this season for example are new all-Bulgarian records. Trunchanin 09:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think we should actually remove content, but rather add more - the history section is still incomplete, we could probably integrate those scores there. The article needs a copyedit and some reorganization, I believe. → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → 13:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Away colors
They are all yellow not yellow and black.Change them!
[edit] Club name
I, as a Levski fan, take this "PFC Levski Sofia" heading as highly insulting. The name of our beloved club has always been simply LEVSKI, not even Levski Sofia, because this is the true people's club and as such it belongs to all Bulgarians, not only the ones in Sofia. I do not know if there is any way the name of the article can be changed, because as I already mentioned the real name must be simply Levski, or Levski Sofia the most. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mgyozov (talk • contribs) 22:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] NOT the best in Bulgaria
Levski is the most widely supported Bulgarian football club. Who said this silly thing? The club is equally supported along with CSKA Sofia so no one can say whether levski or cska is the most supported club. Johny1407 20:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Look at the attendance since there is attendance statistics. Levski IS the most widely supported Bulgarian football club, like it or not. --- RebornToConquer, 20:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Slavia-Sofia.png
Image:Slavia-Sofia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:CSKA-sofia-logo.gif
Image:CSKA-sofia-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
