Talk:Peter Reith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Flag
Portal
Peter Reith is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.

[edit] Cleanup

The article needs a fair bit of work. it doesn't read very well and there is quite a bit of additional information that could be added, including the two links below.Wikicanfixit 09:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the infobox. Reith was not just Minister for Defence. Wikipeterproject 07:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
the link to PM Howard Press Release, 17 February, 2002, access date 30 January, 2007, could not be found on 04 March 2007 Mickiewiki 09:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I have added links to examples of "criticism from unions and ALP" to satisfy "Citation Needed" tag and removed the tag. --HKL47 03:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possible Wiki Links

I am currently testing an automated Wikipedia link suggester. Here are the results of running it on this article:

  • Can link Minister for Defence: ...overnment from 2001 to 2004. As Minister for Defence, he was provided Howard with what was l...
  • Can link election campaign: ...childen overboard" during the 2001 election campaign. He has been widely accused of lying ab...

Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these links may be wrong, some may be right; You can leave positive feedback or negative feedback; Please feel free to delete this section from the talk page. -- Nickj 04:34, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Telephone Affair

Why is the reference to the Telephone affair being removed after replacement? There is nothing libelous about it; it is documented; it is factual. The original sentence was simple, clear, neutral, and referenced. Later replacements were not quite so neutral, but their removal should have been discussed here.

I note that in all cases the edits were made by an unnamed editor. Is this one of the self-serving edits made Australian Government employees?

I am going to re-insert the original wording. HKL47 03:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

A Reverse DNS lookup shows the last edit came from drkw.com, which is appears to be a European investment bank. Peter Ballard 03:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
How very interesting. --HKL47 08:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Potentially more interesting than the one political edit from the PM's department, which were a total media beatup. Peter Ballard 09:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)