Talk:Pete Muldoon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Pete Muldoon has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 5, 2007.
December 1, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, an attempt at building a useful ice hockey resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). Edit this message Ice hockey Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Good article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): See above b (MoS): See above notes.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

The work passes all criteria. The only thing I found a problem - i notified on IRC. So it passes.^Mitch32^contribs 19:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)