Talk:PeopleMover

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Disney on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.

"usually always"?  :-)

Haha, I probably meant to say "nearly always." Now it just says "usually." :) --Lyght 02:14, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] unreliable?

The PeopleMover was always a popular attraction, despite the fact that it was unreliable, and took the lives of two guests, although the guests were at fault for jumping out of their cars, and were crushed by oncoming trains.

Firstly, this seems kind of weird considering it's under the heading 'Deaths'. The focus of the sentence seems to be on the popularity despite the deaths, not on the deaths themselves.

Also, there's nothing anywhere in the article that indicates why it's 'unreliable'. Shouldn't someone qualify that statement somewhere?

Some kind of external reference to confirm the fact of these deaths would be good too. -Dalziel 86 07:13, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Okay, I don't know why I wrote that part the way I did, but I know for a fact the attraction did claim the lives of two guests jumping cars. I guess I thought unreliable because there wasn't enough safety equipment to protect these kids from jumping their cars. --Lyght 05:12, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
It's not Disney's fault for kids PURPOSELY getting out of the vehicles. It'd be unreliable if the people fell out of the car unwillingly, such as the door opening by accident, and the person falling out.Ramfan2772 20:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, it's just like saying Pirates of the Caribbean or It's a Small World killed people because there weren't any safety measures, or what about the train that goes around the parks? Nothing can hold back morons who jump from moving vehicles. --blm07 21:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Nothing that was on the ride. If there were seatbelts (which I don't recall when I went in 1995), then there would be. Something could have, but it didn'tCoastergeekperson04's talk@01/04/2008 00:05

[edit] First sentence

In the line (July 2, 1967August 21, 1995) sounds like a person. PeopleMover was not a person, it was a ride. Should something be done to this, or w=should it just be removed because it's in the infobox? —Coastergeekperson04's talk@01/04/2008 00:04