User talk:Peacenik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Peacenik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Thanks for your edit, but we already have a page that discusses the term as well as the book Utopia. To learn more try out the above links. Thanks again. :) Arminius 04:23, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Cosmotheism

The reverts on Cosmotheism are made because one of the worst editors in Wikipedia history is obsessed with having the article slanted in favor of Wm. Pierce. Please read this page User:Paul Vogel before considering whether we are being fair to an anonymous editor who signs his name 'PV'. I am not a Vogel authority, but I believe that one of the reasons the Cosmotheism article was turned into a re-direct is that Vogel exhausted everyone's patience. As for Chardin, the link to Cosmotheism is no longer there. If you're interested in this topic, other editors, like user:Mirv, may be able to give you more of the history. Cheers, -Willmcw 05:24, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Arecibo message non-prime number

Your perspicacity is exceeded only by your pulchritude! I've reworded it, though I can't claim responsibility for the original gaffe. (I think that entire sentence could stand to be be wholly reworked.) Kbh3rd 18:20, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Opus Dei

"Opus Dei has approximately 85,000 odd members in sixty countries, with central offices in Rome. In 1982 it was erected as a Personal Prelature by Pope John Paul II, who also canonized its founder on 6 October 2002.

   Have you met any? Maybe it was right already.

--Peacenik 21:27, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)"

I'm sure it was right and they're all very odd :) Just in case I misconstrued your comment - I deleted "odd" because it was made redundant by the "approximately", and is too conversational in style for an encyclopaedia IMHO. I'm still inexperienced around Wikipedia - wasn't sure whether to reply on my own discussion page or yours - so I did both! Cheers. Jez 22:49, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Enlightening What is Enlightenment?

I don't properly understand what you've done here. The redirect has been put in incorrectly, and the link from Enlightenment (concept) which refers back to the entry is now a circular reference. The year-old talk comment suggesting this change appears to be from a previous move. Things look to be a bit of a mess at the moment, so I'll most likely simply revert your change. Buffyg 10:57, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

How are you (apa kabar) Peacenik? And welcome to Wikipedia! Just to let you know, at the Indonesian WikiProject there are a group of editors collaborating to improve the articles related to Indonesia. We hope you can join us to make the project even better!

Here are some Indonesia-related project resources which may be of use:

Hope you find these useful. If not you can improve them, it's Wikipedia!
Okay, happy editing and take care.

cheers -- Imoeng 03:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks very much. I live in Melbourne btw, just like zillion other Indonesians :P Okay, take care, thanks for your any help -- Imoeng 03:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)