Talk:PeaZip
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unreferenced tag status: as soon as I noticed "unreferenced" tag I tried to publish links to independent, meaningful and verifiable sources about challangeable content in PeaZip article, as requested by "Citing sources" guidelines. Criteria: since this is English Wikipedia I gave priority to sources in English language, but without omitting meaningful and qualified sources in other languages, as in "Citing sources" guidelines, and not submitted links to any of my original works or program's descriptions, only ones written by independent editor and reviewers. Since this is the first time I publish a "References" section I'll be glad to know if the way I chose and published the reference sources is acceptable, and where should it be improved.
Current links (20:47, 24 March 2008) are:
links 1 and 2 points to articles on qualified and well known online sources about Free Software and Linux: Linux.com and LinuxUser.de;
links 3 and 4 points to articles (not download reviews) on mainstream download websites: Download.com and FreeDownloadsCenter.com;
links 5 and 6 points to articles on well known PC magazines that I think may be meaningful even if not in English language: Netzwelt and PC-Open;
links 7 to 11 points to editor's (not publisher-submitted) download reviews of well known download sites: Softpedia, Softonic (multilingual), CHIP Online and PortableApps;
links 12 and 13 points to authoritative compression benchmarks: Maximum Compression and Matt Mahoney's Large Text Benchmark on fit.edu; those links explain the choice of integrating support for PAQ/LPAQ (which are still experimental, cutting edge technologies) in PeaZip.
links 14 to 16 points to third party authors' webpages linking back to PeaZip project page: 7-Zip.org, FreeArc and Matt Mahoney's compression page on fit.edu; those links are about the claimed support for specific archive formats in PeaZip.
Please let me know if and when I can delete "Unreferenced" tag, or if more / different references are needed to be published. Thanks in advance for the attention! Giorgio Tani (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC) About one week is passed after I added references, IMHO I would keep "Unreferenced tag" for anoter week and then delete it if no utter feedback is given about this issue. Giorgio Tani (talk) 06:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
