User talk:Paulmaunders
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Commercial use of Image:Fubra logo.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Fubra logo.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Fubra logo.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Fubra logo.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fubra Limited
I have moved this article, to save the content, to your user space. It currently reads like SPAM especially since it does not seem particulalry notable. The style is also not encyclopedic. I have recommended it is reviewed for deletion. David D. (Talk) 18:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi paul, i just noted your message. I realise it was a work in progress but given your personal involvement i thought it best to delete. I did save the copy for you since I think it has promise. You need to model it on other company sites. It comes across as far to like a personal recollection rather than a sourced third party description. If you have good sources quote them. Personal information known only to you and your partner are not acceptable. The verifiability of the article is more important that the truth. I know this sounds a bit silly but it is critical to ensure the accuracy of the articles here. I hope these pointer help you develop the article into something more useful to the encyclopedia. Feel free to ask for help in proof reading. David D. (Talk) 16:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of List of companies based in Aldershot
A tag has been placed on List of companies based in Aldershot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Closedmouth (talk) 06:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
