Talk:Paul Kelly (journalist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

Portal	Paul Kelly (journalist) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Australia because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP Australia}} template, removing {{WP Australia}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] "Regarded by many"

Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts? Wetman

It's safe to say that his books on the 1975 are widely regarded as the best available treatement. But, yes, we should provide a source for that statement. Newspapers from around 11-Nov-2005 might be a good place to start looking. CWC(talk) 15:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Australian editor

Does anyone know what the 'editor-at-large' and 'editor-in-chief' distinction refers to? It sounds a bit like an in-joke from the paper itself and needs to be elaborated upon. Ashmoo 03:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)