Talk:Paul Goodman (writer)/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article, as of 1/29/07, is unfair. It still looks from the discussion like the principal contributor wants to include judgmental and skewed stuff about Goodman's sex life (i.e., common law" wives are perfectly legal and ordinary, so why the mention?), and to continue to argue a proclivity by Goodman for "pederasty" and man-boy love. For anyone who is familiar with Goodman's life and work, and not grinding some axe, this is factually inaccurate and totally-off-base. It may be fair argument, but it has has no place in a purportedly objective encyclopedia biography. If this an example is what Wikipedia can readily become when a person is grinding such an axe, then it is a grave disappointment. Thomasrodd 20:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)