Talk:Parvovirus B19
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Viruses WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve and organize articles about biological viruses on Wikipedia. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus David Ruben Talk 01:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merger proposal
This is the text of the proposal. It was misplaced, but I am moving it to the correct location. I will leave a note for the proposing editor. :) --Moonriddengirl 13:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
| “ | I'm new to this merging thing. Don't know if I've noted it correctly. It seems pretty clear, however, that Fifth Disease should be merged into Parvovirus B19. Also, a search for "Fifth Disease" should redirect to Parvovirus B19. User:Adammarklenny. 09:18, 6 October 2007 | ” |
- I agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.180.17.173 (talk) 22:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong disagree - fairly strong convention to separate out the biology of the organism, from the disease caused. eg Herpes simplex virus and Herpes simplex, rhinovirus and Common cold. This especially true when there is not an absolute 1-to-1 mapping of organism & disease eg Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae both causing Pneumonia, and Parvocirus B19 not just causing Fifth's disease but also seronegative arthritis (and no one surely suggesting that arthritis merges into this article).David Ruben Talk 03:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong disagree. See User:Davidruben's logic. There should, however, be prominant links between the two pages. Ask User:Arcadian (administrator) to chime in before this gets merged, please. A0900 18:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
