Talk:Parliamentary Private Secretary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Parliamentary Private Secretary was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

I have renovated and furnished the article, unfortunately it logged me out while I was doing it so I don't think it saved my signature, for anyone who wants to know who worked on it Douglike 11:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA

I've regettably failed the article as a Good Article candidate. My concerns are basically as follows:

  • The article is too brief. It needs significantly more content and analysis of the role. Everything there is basically right (and, just as importantly, sourced) but I am convinced more can be said.
  • In general, the paragraphs are very short - if more material can be added then this stylistic point will be easy to address.
  • Some images would be nice.

Regards, The Land 16:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

== Addition of

Accuracy dispute
 This article or section appears to contradict itself. Please help fix this problem.

template ==

I've added the contradict template to this article as in one paragraph it says that the role of PPS does not mean that said person is part of the gov't whereas further down the page it says that they are members of the gov't. Quite clearly contradictory I would say.

If someone could please take a look at the page and either correct this or discuss it further with other editors, that would be great.

Deanjwigan 00:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)