Partially ordered set

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Hasse diagram of the set of all subsets of a three-element set {x, y, z}, ordered by inclusion.
The Hasse diagram of the set of all subsets of a three-element set {x, y, z}, ordered by inclusion.

In mathematics, especially order theory, a partially ordered set (or poset) formalizes the intuitive concept of an ordering, sequencing, or arrangement of the elements of a set. A poset consists of a set together with a binary relation that describes, for certain pairs of elements in the set, the requirement that one of the elements must precede the other. However, a partially ordered set differs from a total order in that some pairs of elements may not be related to each other in this way. A finite poset can be visualized through its Hasse diagram, which depicts the ordering relation between certain pairs of elements and allows one to reconstruct the whole partial order structure.

A familiar real-life example of a partially ordered set is a collection of people ordered by genealogical descendancy. Some pairs of people bear the ancestor-descendant relationship but, in general, other pairs bear no such relationship.

Contents

[edit] Formal definition

A partial order is a binary relation "≤" over a set P which is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive, i.e., for all a, b, and c in P, we have that:

  • a ≤ a (reflexivity);
  • if a ≤ b and b ≤ a then a = b (antisymmetry);
  • if a ≤ b and b ≤ c then a ≤ c (transitivity).

In other words, a partial order is an antisymmetric preorder.

A set with a partial order is called a partially ordered set (also called a poset). The term ordered set is sometimes also used for posets, as long as it is clear from the context that no other kinds of orders are meant. In particular, totally ordered sets can also be referred to as "ordered sets", especially in areas where these structures are more common than posets.

[edit] Examples

Standard examples of posets arising in mathematics include:

  • The real numbers ordered by the standard less-than-or-equal relation ≤.
  • The set of subspaces of a vector space ordered by inclusion.
  • For a partially ordered set P, the sequence space containing all sequences of elements from P, where sequence a precedes sequence b if every item in a precedes the corresponding item in b. Formally, (a_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} \le (b_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} if and only if a_n \le b_n for all n in N.
  • For a set X and a partially ordered set P, the function space containing all functions from X to P, where fg if and only if f(x)g(x) for all x in X.

[edit] Orders on the Cartesian product of partially ordered sets

In order of increasing strength, i.e., decreasing sets of pairs, three of the possible partial orders on the Cartesian product of two partially ordered sets are:

All three can similarly be defined for the Cartesian product of more than two sets.

Applied to ordered vector spaces over the same field, the result is in each case also an ordered vector space.

See also orders on the Cartesian product of totally ordered setshttp://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/t/o/t/Total_order.html#Orders_on_the_Cartesian_product_of_totally_ordered_sets.

[edit] Strict and non-strict partial orders

In some contexts, the partial order defined above is called a non-strict (or reflexive, or weak) partial order. In these contexts a strict (or irreflexive) partial order "<" is a binary relation that is irreflexive and transitive, and therefore asymmetric. In other words, asymmetric (hence irreflexive) and transitive.

Thus, for all a, b, and c in P, we have that:

  • ¬(a < a) (irreflexivity);
  • if a < b then ¬(b < a) (asymmetry); and
  • if a < b and b < c then a < c (transitivity).

There is a 1-to-1 correspondence between all non-strict and strict partial orders.

If "≤" is a non-strict partial order, then the corresponding strict partial order "<" is the reflexive reduction given by:

a < b if and only if (ab and ab)

Conversely, if "<" is a strict partial order, then the corresponding non-strict partial order "<" is the reflexive closurehttp://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/b/i/n/Binary_relation.html#Operations_on_binary_relations "≤" given by:

ab if and only if a < b or a = b.

This is the reason for using the notation "≤".

Strict partial orders are useful because they correspond more directly to directed acyclic graphs (dags): every strict partial order is a dag, and the transitive closure of a dag is both a strict partial order and also a dag itself.

[edit] Inverse and order dual

The inverse or converse ≥ of a partial order relation ≤ satisfies xy if and only if yx. The inverse of a partial order relation is reflexive, transitive, and antisymmetric, and hence itself a partial order relation. The order dual of a partially ordered set is the same set with the partial order relation replaced by its inverse. The irreflexive relation > is to ≥ as < is to ≤.

Any of these four relations ≤, <, ≥, and > on a given set uniquely determine the other three.

In general two elements x and y of a partial order may stand in any of four mutually exclusive relationships to each other: either x < y, or x = y, or x > y, or x and y are incomparable (none of the other three). A totally ordered set is one that rules out this fourth possibility: all pairs of elements are comparable and we then say that trichotomy holds. The natural numbers, the integers, the rationals, and the reals are all totally ordered by their algebraic (signed) magnitude whereas the complex numbers are not. This is not to say that the complex numbers cannot be totally ordered; we could for example order them lexicographically via x+iy < u+iv if and only if x < u or (x = u and y < v), but this is not ordering by magnitude in any reasonable sense as it makes 1 greater than 100i. Ordering them by absolute magnitude yields a preorder in which all pairs are comparable, but this is not a partial order since 1 and i have the same absolute magnitude but are not equal, violating antisymmetry.

[edit] Number of partial orders

Partially ordered set of set of all subsets of a six-element set {a, b, c, d, e, f}, ordered by the subset relation.
Partially ordered set of set of all subsets of a six-element set {a, b, c, d, e, f}, ordered by the subset relation.

Sequence A001035 in OEIS gives the number of partial orders on a set of n elements:

Number of n-element binary relations of different types
n all transitive reflexive preorder partial order total preorder total order equivalence relation
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 16 13 4 4 3 3 2 2
3 512 171 64 29 19 13 6 5
4 65536 3994 4096 355 219 75 24 15
OEIS A002416 A006905 A053763 A000798 A001035 A000670 A000142 A000110

The number of strict partial orders is the same as that of partial orders.

[edit] Linear extension

A total order T is a linear extension of a partial order P if, whenever xy in P it also holds that xy in T. In computer science, algorithms for finding linear extensions of partial orders are called topological sorting.

[edit] Category theory

When considered as a category where hom(x, y) = {(x, y) | xy} and (y, z)o(x, y) = (x, z), posets are equivalent to one another if and only if they are isomorphic. In a poset, the smallest element, if any, is an initial object, and the largest element, if any, a terminal object. Also, every pre-ordered set is equivalent to a poset. Finally, every subcategory of a poset is isomorphism-closed.

[edit] Partial orders in topological spaces

If P is a topological space, then it is customary to assume that R is closed in P\times P. Under this assumption relations are well behaved in limits; if a_i\to a and aiRb for all i, then aRb. See Deshpande (1968).

Relation R\subset P\times P in a topological space P is often called multifunction, set-valued map, multivalued function or correspondence. Its theory was fairly systematically developed for the first time in C.Berge ,,Topological spaces" 1963. One can differentiate in this context many continuity concepts, primarily closed graph property and upper and lower hemicontinuity. (One should be warned that often the terms upper and lower semicontinuous are used instead of upper and lower hemicontinuous reserved for the case of weak topology in domain; yet we arrive at the collision with the reserved names for upper and lower simicontinuous real-valued function).

Multifunctions arise in optimal control theory, especially differential inclusions and related subjects as game theory, where the Kakutani fixed point theorem for multifunctions has been applied to prove existence of Nash equilibria. This amongst many other properties loosely associated with approximability of upper hemicontinuous multifunctions via continuous functions explains why upper hemicontinuity is more preferred than lower hemicontinuity. Nevetheless, lower hemicontinuous multifunctions usually possess continuous selections as stated in the Michael selection theorem which provides another characterisation of paracompact spaces (see: E.Michael ,,Continuous selections I" Ann. of Math. (2) 63 (1956), and D.Repovs, P.V.Semenov ,,Ernest Michael and theory of continuous selections" arXiv:0803.4473v1).

[edit] Interval

For ab, the interval [a,b] is the set of points x satisfying ax and xb, also written axb. It contains at least the points a and b. One may choose to extend the definition to all pairs (a,b). The extra intervals are all empty.

Using the corresponding strict relation "<", one can also define the interval (a,b) as the set of points x satisfying a < x and x < b, also written a < x < b. An open interval may be empty even if a < b.

Also [a,b) and (a,b] can be defined similarly.

[edit] References

  • J. V. Deshpande, On Continuity of a Partial Order, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1968, pp. 383-386
  • Bernd S. W. Schröder, Ordered Sets: An Introduction (Boston: Birkhäuser, 2003)
  • Richard P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, vol.1, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 49, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-66351-2

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

  • sequence A001035 in OEIS: number of partial orders on a set of n elements.