User talk:Panasonic91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Livonia, Michigan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 16:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Livonia, Michigan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Livonia, Michigan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bigfoot sightings

Hi! If you want to add information which appears to someone on the other side of the world to be vandalism, then my recomendation is that you re-add the information, ONLY when you have found a reliable source to prove it. Citing the online news article in which it appears would be the most suitable method of doing this. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Verifiability basically sums up why it needs to be referenced. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Panasonic91! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I hope some of these links help you get to grips with more of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 17:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Clarenceville School District, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. Seddon69 (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Clarenceville School District. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)