Talk:Panko Brashnarov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Bulgaria This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Bulgaria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Bulgaria-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing!
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list for Panko Brashnarov: edit  · history  · watch  · refresh

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

[edit] Ethnic Macedonian

The source does not say that he himself described as Macedonian, please do not insert partsan links. ForeignerFromTheEast 00:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello ForeignerFromTheEast and thank you for using the talk page this time. I will start of with the link. It is a scan of an official document and therefore non-partisan. The site is owned by the Soros Foundation [[1]] it is a "private operating and grantmaking foundation, aims to shape public policy to promote democratic governance, human rights, and economic, legal, and social reform." it is owned by neither a Bulgarian or Macedonian and is therefore also unbiased and non-partisan. On the other hand the links you provide are all from Bulgarian sources and in this case it is a conflict of interest and unfortunately cannot be taken as "non partisan".Ireland101 —Preceding comment was added at 01:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Not quite. It is soros.com.mk and it is infamous for its falsified pieces of historical materials. ForeignerFromTheEast 01:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Soros.com.mk is still owned by the Soros foundation. Your claim that it is "infamous for its falsified pieces of historical materials" is new to me. Please provide a link to support you accusation.Ireland101 —Preceding comment was added at 01:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Sure: this is the falsified version: [2]. This is the true version: Image:Bulgarian Folk Songs.jpg. ForeignerFromTheEast 01:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I do not think anything is falsified, it just seems that they cropped the image a little off at the top. In order for them to have falsified it they would have had to add information or change it. Ireland101 —Preceding comment was added at 01:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The information is changed. "Bulgarian" is lost from the title "Bulgarian folk songs". This is a clear falsification. ForeignerFromTheEast 01:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
I am trying to understand your logic however I am having troubles. If someone cropped off(accidentally or intentionaly, it is unknown) the word Encyclopedia off of Encyclopedia Brittanica would that be "falsification". I don't think so.Ireland101 01:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
It means that they are either careless or choosing to hide information. Either way unreliable source. ForeignerFromTheEast 01:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The word propagamda just slips off your tongue. This is a clear case. --Laveol T 09:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)