Talk:Panic Room (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

no way is the daughter supposed to be 9! Its never stated in the movie, but i reckon about 14? Juvenile Diabetes often does not show itself until early teens, so that'd be my guess.

is that a real apartment number? is there some type of policy about that like there is with 555 phone numbers? - Omegatron 02:03, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)

juvenile diabetes can manifest as early as 3-4years. though it generally is more commonly manifested around 8-14 years. so it is paussible that the daughter could be any age claimed in the film.

I was diagnosed at the age of 5, actually, so 9 isn't too unrealistic. What is unrealistic is the depiction of diabetics. While I didn't see the whole movie, from what I did see, the girl's role was to eat all the food in the panic room to keep her blood sugar up and then nearly die when she doesn't get an injection within 15 minutes. And then there's here "blood sugar watch", which my doctor said was basically the biggest load of crap he had ever seen. Perhaps something about that in the article?--209.243.31.233 12:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I have edited this to reflect that it is a glugaon shot NOT an insulin shot that Sarah is given. An insulin shot whould be extremely dangerous to someone with low blood sugar. 217.44.112.246 18:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move to Panic Room (film). Duja 08:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


Panic RoomPanic Room (movie) – Having Panic room and Panic Room go to different pages seems unnecissarily confusing. Vicarious 05:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

  • Oppose The disambiguation comments at the top seem sufficient to me. No need to move. Support I'll go with the flow - as long as it's (film) and not (movie) ! -- Beardo 19:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Support - disambiguating by a single capitalized letter is not sufficient. --Yath 17:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Support - along with seconding that naming convention (film) be followed. Otto4711 21:43, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose, we disambiguate like this all the time. It doesn't seem to cause any problems... Recury 23:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Panicroom004.jpg

Image:Panicroom004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Panicroom003.jpg

Image:Panicroom003.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Panicroom002.jpg

Image:Panicroom002.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Panicroom001.jpg

Image:Panicroom001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thriller

I've changed it to a thriller. In NO WAY is this an action film. Mark handscombe (talk) 07:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)