Talk:Pamunkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale.
Suggested article edit guidelines: To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification. Before assessing this article, be sure to check the existing Archive of assessments made under the previous system (used until July 2006), and feel free to help in migrating the existing comments besides from adding your own evaluation. After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
View comments (edit) did pocahontas live in the pamunkey tribe ??

You've got to be kidding... the Pamunkey tribe has existed for 10-12 thousand years?? Thats most of the time that humans have even been in the Americas. The Pamunkey's ancestors were here that long and probably more, but I very much doubt that as a self-recognized Pamunkey nation they existed anywhere near that long. Murple 16:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

I will be removing the photo of Mr. Krigsvold as it adds nothing to the article. Perhaps consider adding a tribal member in traditional garb?68.194.111.216 22:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] POV and tone

The article reads in part like a school paper, and wanders too much in its approach. Needs to be reworked to be more succinct, or better identify historic sections and relation to current members of the tribe. It also seems one-sided. At the very least, it needs sourcing of unsupported statements.--Parkwells (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)