Talk:Pakatan Rakyat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by WikiProject Malaysia.

This project provides a central approach to Malaysia-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Congratulations!

Congratulations to Pakatan Rakyat! And to whoever who made this article. I meant to do it first but oh well. - Alistaire 211.24.8.228 (talk) 08:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Pakatan Rakyat is translated as People's Alliance or People's Pact? I think it is People's Pact. --Zack2007 (talk) 11:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
I think its People's Pact. If you do an internet search most English translations point to "People's Pact" but someone here keeps changing the name back to People's Alliance. The Malay word for alliance is "perikatan" not "pakatan" as in Parti Perikatan, the Alliance (old name for Barisan Nasional). Someone please do the changes. - Alistaire 211.24.5.11 (talk) 02:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] People's Pact v. People's Alliance

Could the person who keeps reverting the English translation from People's Pact to People's Alliance step right up and explain why you think it should be so here please. Otherwise I should think we need admin intervention to lock this article till the edit dispute is solved. -Alistaire 121.120.13.129 (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

Could someone rewrite the "Controversies" section. Seems very controversial in itself (ie biased) to me. 121.120.101.22 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

"Controversies" renamed "Dispute with Barisan Nasional" but as of yet no one wants to address neutrality issues for the record. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.120.42.47 (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)