User talk:P.F.O.S.B.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] October 2007

[edit] New page patrolling

You're doing a great job patrolling new pages and placing speedy deletion tags on them. Keep it up. I just wanted to note that Hassan yonis habane was not patent nonsense. It was written in Somali. I deleted it because it was a copyright violation of a Somali article at this website. Just be aware in the future that foreign language new pages may be legitimate articles needing translation. Again, good job. Leebo T/C 17:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the positive feedback and the info. Unfortunately, I don't speak Somali and the content seemed like a random collection of characters to me. Sorry about that. P.F.O.S.B. 17:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Not at all a problem, because the article was still something that should be speedy deleted. You'll gain experience in seeing the kinds of things people create as you tag more articles. One suggestion I have is that you might consider placing the warning tags that appear at the bottom of the speedy deletion templates on the user talk pages of the creators. This lets them know their article has been tagged. Leebo T/C 17:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nov 07, 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Abortion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 18:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Gas Chamber has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Using edit summaries that are clearly not correct, such as "expired link fixed" or "typos fixed", for edits in which you made substantive changes to the content of an article is not appropriate. Thank you. - Eron Talk 18:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Please do not describe my reversion of your POV edits as "vandalism". If you have an issue with them, raise it on the appropriate article's talk page, or bring it to my talk page. Unfounded accusations of vandalism may be considered personal attacks. - Eron Talk 19:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Your work with CSD is greatly appreciated, but I have to agree with EronMain that your conduct related to these articles is not to be tolerated. It's disingenuous to make content changes to the article described in your edit summaries as "fixing typos". In addition, as described above, a good faith change to the encyclopedia cannot be vandalism, so do not refer to such edits in this way. Leebo T/C 19:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion at AN/I

Hello P.F.O.S.B.. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you.

Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 19:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)