Talk:Pál Teleki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scouting Wiki Project Pál Teleki is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Photo request It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
WikiProject Hungary This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Hungary. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale.

Ga, this is not an NPOV article. It's two different POV articles put side to side. This is hardly an encyclopedia article at all. It should explain who Teleki was and what he did, not explain what different people think of him, at least not primarily. john k 23:02, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Wow, almost two years, and still the same. Sigh. john k 18:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, you could fix it... Chris 03:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
That Time article looks like a good place to start. I'd work on it, but I currently have 4 editing sessions open -- this dang site is awful for easily-distracted people like me :D. Vorik111 07:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)