Talk:Oviraptorosauria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article, image or category is supported by WikiProject Dinosaurs, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
[edit] Oviraptorisaurs as birds
It is possible that in the future, new specimens of already-known oviraptorosaur genera will be found with feather impressions. This would place the oviraptorosaurs, along with the therizinosaurs, in the Aves. Also, Paraves would be synonymous with Maniraptora.
- Only if using the apomorphy-based definition of Aves (that is, if you define Aves to mean "animal with feathers"). Anyway, why would this only happen if previously-known genera are found with feathers? Several species already preserve them, like Caudipteryx and Protarcharopteryx. Also, some paleontologists, including osome of the foremost experts on oviraptorosaurs (Osmolska, etc.), think they're avians based just on skeletal features.
While I personally favor an apomorphy-based definition of Aves, most paleontologists use a node-based definition (Archaeopteryx+modern birds). Therefore, if oviraptorosaurs are birds, it has to be shown that they're more advanced than Archaeopteryx (which, again, Osmolska et al. have attempted to do).Dinoguy2 22:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise in anatomy
I like the way this has been handled, J. But maybe we could go just a step further and include this type of material in a separate section (like "Technical description") at the bottom of the article? That way the information will be here, and your average reader will not get turned off and give up reading because they think it's over their heads. Dinoguy2 (talk) 14:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
