Overhead valve

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Components of a pushrod valve actuation system
Components of a pushrod valve actuation system
Picture of a V8 engine block (with intake manifold removed), showing the camshaft, pushrods, and rockers.
Picture of a V8 engine block (with intake manifold removed), showing the camshaft, pushrods, and rockers.

An overhead valve (OHV) engine, also called pushrod engine or I-head engine is a type of piston engine that places the camshaft in the cylinder block (usually beside and slightly above the crankshaft in a straight engine or directly above the crankshaft in the V of a V engine) and uses pushrods or rods to actuate rocker arms above the cylinder head to actuate the valves. Lifters or tappets reside in the engine block between the camshaft and pushrods.

This contrasts with an overhead cam (OHC) design which places the camshaft(s) above the cylinder head and drives the valves directly or through short rocker arms. In an OHC engine, the camshaft(s) are normally part of the cylinder head assembly, while in an I-head engine the camshaft (rarely more than one) is part of the main engine block assembly.

In 1949, Oldsmobile introduced the Rocket V8. It was the first high-compression I-head design, and is the archetype for most modern pushrod engines. General Motors is the world's largest pushrod engine producer with engines such as the 3800 Series III Supercharged V6 (260 hp, 280 lbf·ft torque), LS7 Chevrolet Corvette 7.0 L V8 Engine (505 hp, 475 lbf·ft torque) and LS4 5.3 L DOD V8 (303 hp, 323 lbf·ft torque). Few pushrod type engines remain in production. This is a result of few manufacturers wanting to design both OHV and OHC engines. However, in 2002, Chrysler introduced a new pushrod engine: a 5.7L Hemi engine. The new Chrysler Hemi engine presents advanced features such as variable displacement technology and has been a popular option with buyers. The Hemi was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 2003 through 2007. Chrysler also produced the world's first production variable valve OHV engine with independent intake and exhaust phasing. The system is called CamInCam [1], and was first used in the 600hp SRT-10 engine for the 2008 Dodge Viper.

Contents

[edit] History

In automotive engineering, an overhead valve internal combustion engine is one in which the intake and exhaust valves and ports are contained in the cylinder head.

The original overhead valve or OHV piston engine was developed by the Scottish-American David Dunbar Buick. It employs pushrod-actuated valves parallel to the pistons and this is still in use today. This contrasts with previous designs which made use of side valves and sleeve valves.

Nowadays, side-valves have virtually disappeared (except perhaps in lawn-mower engines) and valves are almost all "overhead". However most are now driven more directly by the overhead camshaft system and these are designated OHC instead (either SOHC or DOHC).

Pushrod engines have become less common in recent years, serving primarily as either truck engines or as budget V6 models for General Motors, though Chrysler's HEMI engines and GM's LS series are a notable exception. Pushrod engines are nearly extinct among other automakers.

[edit] Advantages

Pushrod engines have specific advantages:

  • Smaller overall packaging - Because of the camshaft's location inside the engine block, pushrods are more compact than an overhead cam engine of comparable displacement. For example, Ford's 4.6 L OHC modular V8 is larger than the 5.0 L I-head Windsor V8 it replaced. GM's 4.6 L OHC Northstar V8 is slightly taller and wider than GM's larger displacement 5.7 to 7.0 L I-head LS V8. The Ford Ka uses the venerable Kent Crossflow pushrod engine to fit under its low bonnet line.
  • Less complex drive system - Pushrod engines have a less complex drive system to time the camshaft when compared with OHC engines. Most OHC engines drive the camshaft or camshafts using a timing belt, a chain or multiple chains. These systems require the use of tensioners which add some complexity to the engine. In contrast a pushrod engine has the camshaft positioned next to the crankshaft and can be run with a much smaller chain or even direct gear connection.

[edit] Limitations

Some specific problems that remain with pushrod engines:

  • Limited engine speeds or RPM - Pushrod engines have more valvetrain moving parts thus more valvetrain inertia and mass, as a result they suffer more easily from valve "float" and may exhibit a tendency for the pushrods, if improperly designed, to flex or snap at high engine speeds. Therefore, pushrod engine designs cannot revolve ("rev") at engine speeds as high as OHC designs.

Modern pushrod engines are usually limited to about 6,000 RPM to 8,000 RPM in production vehicles and 9,000 RPM to 10,500 RPM in racing applications. In contrast, many modern OHC engines may have rev limits from 6,000 RPM to 9,000 RPM in road legal vehicles and up to 19,000 RPM in current Formula One race engines using pneumatic valve springs, a technology not viable in pushrod engines. High-revving pushrod engines are normally solid (mechanical) lifter designs, flat and roller. In 1969, Chevrolet offered a Corvette, Camaro Z28, and other models with a solid lifter cam pushrod V8 (the ZL1) that could rev to 8,000 RPM. The Volvo B18 and B20 engines can rev to more than 7,000 RPM with their solid lifter camshaft. However, the LS7 of the C6 Corvette Z06 is the first production hydraulic roller cam pushrod engine to have a redline of 7100 RPM.

  • Limited cylinder head design flexibility - OHC engines benefit substantially from the use of multiple valves as well as much greater freedom of component placement and intake and exhaust port geometry. Most modern pushrod engines have two valves per cylinder, while many OHC engines can have three, four or even five valves per cylinder to achieve greater power. Though multi-valve pushrod engines exist their use is somewhat limited due to their complexity and is mostly restricted to low and medium speed diesel engines. In pushrod engines the size and shape of the intake ports as well as the position of the valves are limited by the pushrods.

[edit] 1994 Mercedes/Ilmor Indianapolis 500 engine

The Indy 500 race in Indianapolis each year bears some vestige of its original purpose as a proving ground for automobile manufacturers, in that it once gave an advantage in engine displacement to engines based on stock production engines, as distinct from out-and-out racing engines designed from scratch. One factor in identifying production engines from racing engines was the use of pushrods, rather than the overhead cams used on most modern racing engines; Mercedes-Benz realized before the 1994 race that they could very carefully tailor a purpose-built racing engine using pushrods to meet the requirements of the Indy rules and take advantage of the 'production based' loophole but still design it to be state of the racing art in all other ways, without any of the drawbacks of a real production-based engine. They entered this engine in 1994, and, as expected, dominated the race. After the race, the rules were changed in order to reduce the amount of boost pressure allowed to be supplied by the turbocharger. The inability of the engine to produce competitive power output after this change caused it to become obsolete after just the one race. Mercedes-Benz knew this beforehand, deciding that the cost of engine development was worth one win at Indianapolis.

[edit] Additional information

The following table is a comparison of various engine configurations and types. This table shows the comparison of some important features of engine design

Engine name Displacement (L) Configuration Valvetrain Car Engine weight (lb) Power (hp) RPM power Torque (lbf·ft) RPM torque Power-weight (hp per lb)
F140 6.0 V12 DOHC 2002 Enzo Ferrari 496 660 7,800 485 5,500 1.33
13B-MSP (Renesis) 1.3 2-Rotor Wankel 2003 Mazda RX-8 180 238 8,500 159 5,500 1.32
M80 5.7 V10 DOHC 2005 Porsche Carrera GT 472 605 8,000 435 5,750 1.28
F130 4.7 V12 DOHC 1995 Ferrari F50 437 513 8,500 347 6,500 1.17
LS7 7.0 V8 Pushrod 2006 Corvette Z06 458 505 6,300 470 4,800 1.10
SRT-10 8.4 V10 Pushrod 2008 Dodge Viper 548 600 6,000 560 5,600 1.09
M156 6.2 V8 DOHC 2007 Mercedes CLK63 AMG 439 475 6,800 465 5,000 1.08
LS3 6.2 V8 Pushrod 2008 Chevrolet Corvette C6 420 436 5,900 428 4,400 1.02
S85 5.0 V10 DOHC 2007 BMW M5 & BMW M6 529 500 7,750 383 6,100 0.94
SRT-10 8.3 V10 Pushrod 2006 Dodge Viper 550 510 5,600 535 4,200 0.93
S65 4.0 V8 DOHC 2007 BMW M3 445 414 8300 295 3900 0.93
M62 5.0 V8 DOHC 2003 BMW M5 527 396 6,600 370 3,800 0.75

Comparison of naturally-aspirated engines for race and road legal track day cars

Engine name Displacement (L) Configuration Valvetrain Car Engine weight (lb) Power (hp) RPM power Torque (lbf·ft) RPM torque Power-weight (hp per lb) Reference
BMW P84/5 3.0 V10 DOHC 2005 Williams FW27 F1 203 925 19,000 NA NA 4.56 [1]
Ferrari Tipo 052 3.0 V10 DOHC 2003 Ferrari F2003-GA F1 203 920 19,500 NA NA 4.53 [2]
Powertec RPB V8 2.8 V8 DOHC Radical SR9 194 450 NA 250 NA 2.32 [3]
Motopower RST-V8 2.0 V8 DOHC Various 163 340 10,250 190 7,000- 7,800 2.09 [4]
Powertec RPA V8 2.6 V8 DOHC Radical SR8 194 380 NA 215 NA 1.96 [5]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links