Talk:Oury Jalloh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] POV

This article seems particularly POV; a quick read should illustrate that. For example, "In spite of the fact that the State Prosecutor of Dessau has made formal accusations of negligent homicide and bodily harm with fatal consequences, new excuses are nevertheless found to close the case—to the point of absurdity."

Seems to me that there are lots of weasel words and phrases designed to provoke sympathy in the reader, and while it may be warranted, Wikipedia is not the appropriate platform. --Chris (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] why is that article not shortened?

most of the stuff, except the first paragraph is intendend to force the readers in a certain way of thinking -- why is an article so biased allowed to stay fully if disputed? it would be far more appropriate if it was shortened to contain nothing but the facts, ie the first paragraph. atm the authors of this article are able to propagate their suspicions without any way to correct those! btw: the article does not even contain the informations of the german article on the topic (which doublessly is ab bit biased) but contains far more informations instead of pure allegations.